Editorial Guidelines
All papers will be sent through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) management system platform in the required format and will be received by the Editorial Team. Once this step is completed, the evaluation process begins, which is carried out by double blind peer reviewers selected by the Editorial Team.
The papers submitted must be original and unpublished and may not have been submitted at the same time to the evaluation and arbitration of another journal.
The reviewers are qualified professionals with training in the area of the submitted work, who evaluate the articles according to the criteria of relevance, originality, contributions to knowledge and scientific and academic rigor, following the rules established by Neuropolis Science Journal (NSJ). At this stage of the evaluation, reviewers and authors will not know any data that identifies them. This aspect is the responsibility of the authors of the submitted papers, and if it is not fulfilled, the authors will be informed that the paper has been rejected.
On the part of the reviewers, their work must be subject to discretion, impartiality of judgment, honesty and respect.
Management Tools and Databases

Our publications follow the ethical standards recommended by OJS (Open Journal Systems) to ensure integrity in the editorial process.

Our publications comply with the ethical standards of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) to ensure editorial integrity.

Submitted papers are verified using Turnitin to ensure compliance with ethical standards.

The journals are part of CrossRef, the official database that generates DOIs for scientific articles.