Resolution of Discrepancies in Review
In the following cases, the manuscript will be sent to a third reviewer for an additional opinion:
a) When there is contradiction between the reviewers' reports (e.g., if one recommends rejection and another suggests publication with minor changes).
b) If the editor considers that the justification of a reviewer is not sufficiently clear or convincing.
The journal has an internal database that records and manages the transfer of manuscripts and the assignment of reviewers. At the end of each year, the list of reviewers who participated in that period is published.
Management Tools and Databases
Our publications follow the ethical standards recommended by OJS (Open Journal Systems) to ensure integrity in the editorial process.
Our publications comply with the ethical standards of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) to ensure editorial integrity.
Submitted papers are verified using Turnitin to ensure compliance with ethical standards.
The journals are part of CrossRef, the official database that generates DOIs for scientific articles.